The Market Segmentation Theory
The market segmentation theory is based on the fact that there are investors who prefer long-term yields (pension funds, insurance companies, etc.) while others prefer short-term yields (investment funds, banks, etc.). A maturity-based market segmentation results, and the rates for each maturity will depend on the existing supply and demand for each segment.
In its simplest form , this theory does not take into account expectations about rate evolution and assumes that each investor always prefers the security that matches his time horizon. However, in practice, each investor has a certain degree of flexibility and will agree to invest in a security whose maturity does not match his or her targets if the yield offered is high enough.
The Expectations Theory
The expectations theory is the oldest of the three theories. It holds that all rates are determined by market expectations with regard to future rates in the short term. This amounts to saying that placing one’s money for a period of two years should be equal to placing it during one year, then placing the sum received at the end of that year for another year.
The Liquidity Preference Theory
The liquidity preference approach holds that investors would rather invest over short-term horizons, in the belief that “a pound in the purse is worth two in the land”. Moreover, uncertainty regarding the debtor’s credit concerning their long-term bonds makes these instruments riskier than short-term securities. They should thus offer higher yields to attract investors.
This theory explains above all an upward-sloping curve. As it is also based on investors’ expectations regarding future rates, it can also explain downward-sloping curves. The liquidity premium would have the effect of mitigating the degressive nature of the structure.
The weakness of this theory lies in the fact that it regards the market as homogeneous whole, with investors showing preference for a certain time horizon. But it is more realistic to consider that investors do not all have the same time horizons. Consequently, investors with longer time horizons will refuse to pay a premium on securities with maturities equalling their target terms and demand a premium for holding securities with shorter maturities. |